“Green Noise”? Blame Corporations, Not Activists
By Jamie Henn - Jun 16th, 2008 at 5:36 pm
An article in yesterday’s New York Times gets one thing right: We are certainly living in the era of “green noise.” Here in San Francisco, you can’t ride the bus or walk around the city without seeing ads and billboards touting the latest green trend. What the piece gets wrong, though, is who’s responsible. It’s not activists who are clogging the airwaves–it’s corporations. The article, “The Era of Green Noise,” laments the plight of the average consumer, who is “bombarded” with green information wherever he or she goes. Environmentalists, not green-washing corporations, are told to pipe down (for their own good, of course):
And some environmentalists fear that the public might begin to ignore their message before any meaningful change can be accomplished. For them, it’s a time to reassess strategies and streamline their campaigns before it’s too late.
If The New York Times , or the mainstream media in general, took the time to listen to the new generation of environmental advocates, what they’d hear isn’t consumer advice, but strong political messages. The new green movement ranges from inner-city of Oakland, where organizations are pioneering green-jobs training programs for disadvantaged youth, to college campuses, where student investment clubs are pushing for endowment transparency and college investment in clean technology. In each case, the message is about radical structural change–not what type of lettuce you should be buying at the store. (Answer: Start a group like People’s Grocery that will give you your lettuce with a little “redefining-capitalism” in the process). It’s not citizen groups that are pushing green products and eco-shopping advice, it’s the green-washing departments of major corporations. Pick up any magazine today and check out the ads. Chevron , Ford , GE , Clorox , Dow –the list goes on and on. I could fill a whole blog post with links to the so-called “green” sections of corporate websites. All that said, the Times article has a point. Environmental advocates, whether they be old-school groups like the Sierra Club or the new front, like the Energy Action Coalition , need to make their message clearer: Solving global warming and other environmental challenges is political , not just personal . I care more about who you voted for in the last election than where you bought your lettuce. If you still want to save the planet, you shouldn’t stress yourself out by changing your light bulbs–you should get busy changing your politicians.



good points!
June 16th, 2008 at 5:56 pmCheck out more greenwashing clips at:
http://www.greenwashingindex.com/
Fight corporate greenwashing at:
June 16th, 2008 at 6:00 pmhttp://www.powervote.org !!!
Hey Jamie! Good call…although I don’t think the message of the Coalition has ever been that changing light bulbs will solve the climate challenge. On the contrary, I believe our message is about empowering young people to be active in a movement LARGER than themselves. Power Vote (http://powervote.org) is a prime example of the Coalition’s work to engage young people in shifting the balance of power within the political system. From the Power Vote pledge: “I pledge to vote, hold our leaders accountable through my sustained involvement, and create a Power Shift!”
June 16th, 2008 at 6:14 pmHey Jamie-
Good post, as per usual. Just wondering why you specifically single out the Sierra Club? Especially when they are one of the few organizations that actually do urge people to vote for environmental champions? They obviously have a lot of other stuff going on, but check out their most recent video- http://www.lightbulbstoleadership.org/
Is that the messaging you’re looking for?
So, I think you’re right to believe that we all need to be clearer in our messaging but I think singling out EAC and the Sierra Club is a little unfair.
June 16th, 2008 at 7:25 pmGreat comments - didn’t mean to single out Sierra Club and EAC in a negative light, but a positive one! Y’all are leading the charge when it comes to political messaging.
Just making the point that articles like this one are a challenge for all of us working on global warming to work even harder to get our political message out there. Clearly the mainstream media is still largely missing the point, no?
This fall is a great opportunity for all sorts of groups to sharpen their political ask on global warming. I’m looking forward to seeing the Sierra Club and EAC at the front of the pack.
June 16th, 2008 at 8:00 pmSweet. Thanks for the clarification.
June 16th, 2008 at 8:03 pmRight on. Thanks.
June 17th, 2008 at 9:49 am